<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Variants for 1830</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kanga.nu/~claw/blog/2009/08/28/game-observances/variants-for-1830/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kanga.nu/~claw/blog/2009/08/28/game-observances/variants-for-1830/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 06:58:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: J C Lawrence</title>
		<link>http://kanga.nu/~claw/blog/2009/08/28/game-observances/variants-for-1830/comment-page-1/#comment-328</link>
		<dc:creator>J C Lawrence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 23:01:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kanga.nu/~claw/blog/?p=623#comment-328</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;In an email exchange with John David Galt about his &quot;Simple&quot; variant, he commented:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;
  &lt;p&gt;What&#039;s up on that long-dead site is all there is.  The variant was
  nothing more than a one-liner response to someone on the 18xx mailing list who wanted an 1830 variant with more companies.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#039;ve updated the article accordingly.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In an email exchange with John David Galt about his &#8220;Simple&#8221; variant, he commented:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>What&#8217;s up on that long-dead site is all there is.  The variant was
  nothing more than a one-liner response to someone on the 18xx mailing list who wanted an 1830 variant with more companies.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>I&#8217;ve updated the article accordingly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J C Lawrence</title>
		<link>http://kanga.nu/~claw/blog/2009/08/28/game-observances/variants-for-1830/comment-page-1/#comment-327</link>
		<dc:creator>J C Lawrence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 19:39:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kanga.nu/~claw/blog/?p=623#comment-327</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Please note that the colour PDF I&#039;ve assembled above for the Coalfields expansion prints the map extensions slightly too small.  It doesn&#039;t accurately match the 1830 map.  The resulting map sections, while undersized are certainly &lt;a href=&quot;http://twitter.com/clearclaw/statuses/3976908736&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;playable albeit also ungainly and clumsy&lt;/a&gt;.  Oddly the track tiles that go onto the board are however just fine.  The track tiles placed by players appear to be small by a similar fraction to the map extensions.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I have not yet determined why this is true, or what the correct scaling factor is.  I estimate by rough eye that it is not far under 10%.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please note that the colour PDF I&#8217;ve assembled above for the Coalfields expansion prints the map extensions slightly too small.  It doesn&#8217;t accurately match the <a href="http://www.boardgamegeek.com/boardgame/421" >1830</a> map.  The resulting map sections, while undersized are certainly <a href="http://twitter.com/clearclaw/statuses/3976908736" rel="nofollow">playable albeit also ungainly and clumsy</a>.  Oddly the track tiles that go onto the board are however just fine.  The track tiles placed by players appear to be small by a similar fraction to the map extensions.</p>

<p>I have not yet determined why this is true, or what the correct scaling factor is.  I estimate by rough eye that it is not far under 10%.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

